Monday, April 11, 2011

condition Care Reform Cons

It seems that the more discussion there is in regard to condition care reform, the more discussion there is in regard to condition care reform cons. Undoubtedly, there has been a need for some type of condition care over haul. Now that condition care reform is a reality many Americans are faced with determining the pros and cons and how they will be affected beyond simple passage to condition care. In this article, we'll discuss different cons or concerns by those opposing and supporting condition care reform and focus on the "biggest con of all".

Pros typically go hand in hand with cons. However, based on numerous emails and invite we'll focus on the biggest con associated with condition care reform and supply a ensue up narrative addressing pros (aside from the following merge of pros/reasons for a reform).

Health Care Reforms

1) As of 2008 there were more than forty million Americans who were uninsured.

condition Care Reform Cons

2) A 2009 American journal of treatment study revealed that sixty two percent of 2007 bankruptcies were the associated to curative expenses.

Obviously with so many being uninsured and filing bankruptcy, one would say that there is certainly a need for condition care reform. However, when we take a closer look, we see different ways that the convert will sway us as well as shed a light on deeper issues. First, the forty plus million uninsured individuals could be somewhat tainted in that these figures likely comprise undocumented immigrants. Second, of the 2007 bankruptcies (sixty two percent of which were associated to curative expenses) over sixty percent of the individuals had curative insurance!

That leads us to one of the biggest cons and one that should be reviewed very closely. That is assurance ignorance (being insured without the knowledge of how your plan works). Sixty percent of 2007 bankruptcies were curative associated and sixty percent of those had curative insurance. The problem here is quite simple in that individuals securing condition coverage are doing so without truly knowing what their coverage means. Does that sound familiar? How about the up-to-date housing implosion? The housing urgency stemmed from many different contributors.

However, it is a widely held view that many new homeowners simply had little knowledge of the terms of their loans and/or those who held the knowledge (lenders, appraisers, originators etc) failed to do an proper job in educating or even attempting to educate possible new homeowners. Many times an personel may be "covered" by an assurance carrier. However, in an endeavor to have low monthly premiums, the personel may pick to have a high deductible.

A monthly superior of 0 or less sounds fantastic until a major condition issue or urgency arises and the personel must come up with thousands in order to meet a deductible. Bear in mind that a car urgency causing the need for major curative work can cost ,000-,000 per day in hospital stay alone (this does not comprise the actual surgical operation to mend the damage). In most cases individuals have no idea how much a hospital stay will run them nor do they have any idea of the bankruptcy statistics.

There are categorically other cons associated with condition care reform. Some comprise longer wait times for individuals to receive determination due to an increased number of insured individuals. However, the "pro" ponents of condition care reform would say that this opens the door for more jobs. Other cons comprise the increase of the federal deficit and increase in taxes we pay. As well as it being difficult to administer because it is too hard to decree what type of coverage should be the minimum guaranteed.

There are many more cons to reform. However, the one that we find most troubling is the knowledge of what an personel will receive in their newly gained policy. Let's not walk down the path of mandating assurance for all individuals without mandating safe bet information that must be shared with the end consumer. The statistics speak for themselves. More than half of the bankruptcies of 2007 were curative associated and more than half of those individuals had coverage. It may be possible to help individuals find credit relief prior to their downfall. However, it will start with the "reformers" implementing condition plans and condition education based on the statistics that we currently have at our fingertips.

condition Care Reform Cons

No comments:

Post a Comment