Friday, May 6, 2011

condition Care Reform - How Are You Affected? - Part 2

To date, little is known about specifics expected to come from the two departments. Hhs will be the customary driver however, while Dol will address union and other labor issues that arise.

Healthcare reforms do address a few definite areas by which employers, large and small, can plan. We do need to remember the final outcome of the law was not to sell out costs. Rather, the purpose was to growth access to condition insurance.

Health Care Reforms

The immediate timeline linked to all owner sponsored condition assurance plans look like this:

condition Care Reform - How Are You Affected? - Part 2

-By September 23, 2010, all assurance plans must offer dependent coverage to children until age 26, regardless of marital status, trainee status, or employment status.
-Tightly restricted annual limits on "Essential condition Benefits" are eliminated
-Waiting periods for pre-existing conditions are eliminated for children under age 19
-Lifetime benefits are eliminated
-35% tax credit (immediate for 2010) for employers who offer and subsidize condition assurance for its employees.

Essential condition Benefits will be best defined by Hhs over time, but will truly comprise mandatory wellness benefits. condition plans in result on or before March 23, are thought about "grandfathered" and thus are exempt from the following mandates. However, a change in carriers, a "substantial" change in benefits, or a great shift in costs of premiums to employees will result in the loss of this exemption. Hhs will issue R & Rs later, supplementary defining the parameters of "substantial change".

Grandfathered plans may enjoy the luxury of smaller excellent increases over time than non-grandfathered plans because these new plans have other, stricter requirements.

In the interim, grandfathered plans are exempt from:

-First dollar coverage for preventive care although some grandfathered plans offer this benefit.
-Non-discrimination rules are extended to assurance plans. That is, supervision may not have a richer benefit plan than non-management
-Emergency care services must be treated as "in-network" without prior authorization
-Pediatricians and Ob-Gyns are thought about customary care providers.

Insurance carriers will be required to abide by a "minimum loss ratio" (Mlr). This will apply to all group assurance plans. In short, the Mlr states that assurance clubs must issue refunds to groups if claims are less than 85% (large groups) and 80% (small groups) of total premiums paid. The reverse is also true. Small groups in particular could face excessively high premiums after one particularly unfavorable year. Some employers who provide condition assurance are now faced with some tough decisions as a result of condition care reform. Non-grandfathered plans are more likely to see significantly higher premiums than grandfathered plans, as R & Rs elaborate some of the uncertainty.

Health Care Reform included some other obscure provisions about which employees are probably unaware. All non-grandfathered plans and owner groups with 25 or more employees (including base rights of 2 or more small businesses) will be subjected to a number of reporting requirements in addition to the mandates listed previously. Too, condition care reform will begin to count part-time employees as well through a formula called "full-time equivalent" (Fte). This could be especially troubling to employers with fewer than 50 full-time employees, but after accounting for Fte of part-time employees they could inadvertently be counted as 50+ and subject to mandates. The Fte formula will be clarified as time goes by, but by January 1, 2014, all non-grandfathered groups will be subject to these mandates.

Health care reform does not need employers to offer group insurance. Nevertheless, penalties will apply to 50+ worker groups (including Fte & remember the base rights rule) who do not offer medical insurance. For instance, an owner would face a 00 fine per worker (31st worker and beyond) if even one worker receives a 00 tax credit from the government toward condition assurance through the change (to be explained in a later column) or through Medicaid.

Employers who offer condition assurance must also offer a free voucher, equal to the employer's contribution, to all employee's whose household income is less than 400% of the federal poverty level. The employers can then buy assurance through the Exchange. If the change is economy than the value of the voucher, the owner is then required to pay the variation to the employee.

On January 1, 2014, the Irs will get involved. Employers of 50+ and not grandfathered will be required to record the value of the condition assurance on W-2's to be issued by January 2012. Penalties will apply here as well if the reported value is greater than ,200 for individuals or ,500 for families. That is, insurers will be assessed an excise tax on the coverage and because of the Mlr, that evaluation will likely be pushed on to employees as higher premiums.

If the employer's offering is less than 60% or the employee's cost share of excellent exceeds 9.5% of household income and an worker receives a government subsidy, then a penalty of ,000 for each worker (31st worker and beyond) is levied..

By March 2012, employers of 50+ and non-grandfathered plans must provide a 4-page pre-enrollment coverage document outlining benefits and exclusions to all new employees. Details will be forthcoming from Hhs.

Reading "between the lines", it would appear the government is manufacture it difficult for employers at or near 50 full-time employees to offer condition insurance. Likewise, employers may be forced to eliminate part-time/seasonal workers and instead opt for overtime to regular/full-time employees to avoid inherent penalties and the possibility of having to cover part-time employees on insurance.

Health care reform includes other mandates that will trigger by January 1, 2014, but are not as likely as the above mandates to alter an employer's basic company model on hiring practices, nor are they as apt to influence an employer's decision on whether to offer insurance.

Inevitably, many more questions will arise. As you can see, the intent with condition care reform is a push toward universal coverage through employers of 50+. Next time, we'll talk about individuals and groups under 50

condition Care Reform - How Are You Affected? - Part 2

No comments:

Post a Comment